Kyouwago

Объявление

Форум создан исключительно с просветительской целью. Вся информация взята из открытых источников. Ссылки на статьи и авторы указаны в описании, все права принадлежат им.
За нелегальное копирование и использование данной информации не по назначению администрация форума ответственности не несет.

Информация о пользователе

Привет, Гость! Войдите или зарегистрируйтесь.


Вы здесь » Kyouwago » Биохимия и микробиология » Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology


Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology

Сообщений 1 страница 5 из 5

1

Тематика журнала: Технические науки, Биология, Медицина, Химия
Язык издания: Русский, Английский
Индекс ISSN: 0003-6838
Периодичность издания: 1 номер в 2 месяца
В перечне ВАК: Да
Материалы индексируются в Scopus: Да
Материалы индексируются в Web of Science: Да
Издательство: Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.
Контактные данные: 119071 Москва, Ленинский проспект, 33 Тел.: +7 (495) 954-65-30 Факс: +7 (495) 954-27-32
E-mail: pbim@inbi.ras.ru
Сайт издания: http://www.maik.ru/cgi-perl/journal.pl? … ame=appbio (https://www.springer.com/life+sciences/ … rnal/10438)
Страна: Россия
Город: Москва
Способ оплаты: Неизвестно
Описание:
Наименование русской версии журнала: Прикладная биохимия и микробиология

Главный редактор:
Editor-in-Chief: Vladimir Popov (Попов Владимир Олегович)

Описание:
Прикладная биохимия и микробиология – журнал, публикующий оригинальные научные статьи об исследованиях в области биохимии и микробиологии, которые имеют или могут иметь практические приложения. Среди основателей и первых авторов журнала – широко известные ученые, такие как А.И. Опарин, В.Н. Шапошников, Н.М. Сисакян, В.Н. Букин, В.Л. Кретович, С.В. Дурмишидзе, Т.Б. Дарканбаев и А.С. Вечер. Тематика публикаций включает производство ферментов, витаминов и других биологически активных веществ, исследования обработки сырья, микробиологический синтез пищевых продуктов и кормов, а также описание новых методов исследования и новых научных приборов. Помимо оригинальных статей, публикуются авторитетные обзоры (которые составляются специалистами в соответствующих областях по просьбе редакционной коллегии), рецензии на книги и отчеты о научных мероприятиях. Журнал принимает к публикации материалы от ученых, работающих в НИИ и ВУЗах стран бывшего СССР и дальнего зарубежья.

Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology (Prikladnaya biokhimiya i mikrobiologiya) publishes original articles in biochemistry and microbiology of present or potential practical applications. The scope of the journal includes studies of enzymes; mechanisms of enzymatic reactions; biosynthesis and biogenesis of physiologically active compounds and the pathways of their regulation; biocatalysis in organic synthesis; and metabolic engineering. In addition to experimental studies the journal publishes invited reviews.

Индексирование и реферирование:
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, SCOPUS, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, Academic OneFile, AGRICOLA, Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, ChemWeb, CNKI, Current Abstracts, EBSCO Academic Search, EBSCO Advanced Placement Source, EBSCO Biological and Agricultural Index, EBSCO Biomedical Reference Collection, EBSCO Book Review Digest Plus (H.W. Wilson) , EBSCO Discovery Service, EBSCO Engineering Source, EBSCO Food Science Source, EBSCO Nanotechnology Collection: India , EBSCO OmniFile Full Text (H.W. Wilson), EBSCO Science Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson), EBSCO STM Source, EBSCO TOC Premier, EMBiology, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, Gale, GeoRef, INIS Atomindex, OCLC, ProQuest Biological Science Database, ProQuest Biology Database, ProQuest Central, ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database, ProQuest Health & Medical Collection, ProQuest Health Research Premium Collection, ProQuest Natural Science Collection, ProQuest Pharma Collection, ProQuest Science Database, ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection, Science Select, SCImago, Summon by ProQuest, Biotechnology Citation Index, CSA, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Summon by Serial Solutions.

EDITORIAL BOARD

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF:

Vladimir O. Popov (Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia)

DEPUTY EDITOR-IN-CHIEF:
Aleksei M. Bezborodov (Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia)

COORDINATING EDITOR:
Nataliya A. Zagustina (Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia)

EDITORIAL BOARD
Sergei V. Benevolensky (Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia), Aleksander M. Boronin (Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia), Igor’ A. Borzenkov (Vinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia), Boris B. Dzantiev (Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia), Lyudmila A. Golovleva (Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia), Mikhail P. Kirpichnikov (Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia), Boris I. Kurganov (Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia), Nina N. Nemova (Institute of Biology Karelian Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, Russia), Aida A. Selezneva (Chemical Pharmaceutical Academy, St. Petersburg, Russia), Igor’ A. Tarchievskii (Presidium of Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia), Igor’ A. Tikhonovich (All-Russia Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology, St. Petersburg, Russia), Tat’yana A. Valueva (Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia), and Valerii P. Varlamov (Institute of Bioengineering, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia)

EDITORIAL COUNCIL
Valentin V. Biryukov (Moscow State University of Mechanical Engineering, Moscow, Russia), Mariya S. Kuyukina (Institute of Ecology and Genetics of Microorganisms, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Perm, Russia), Georgii I. Kvesitadze (Durmishidze Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, National Academy of Sciences of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia), Anatolii G. Lobanok (Institute of Microbiology, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus), Aleksander I. Melent’ev (Institute of Biology, Ufa Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia), Vladimir V. Mosolov (Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia), Valentin S. Podgorskii (Zabolotny Institute of Microbiology and Virology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine), Arkadii P. Sinitsyn (Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia), Yurii A. Trotsenko (Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia), Igor’ A. Yamskov (Institute of Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia), and Anatolii V. Zherdev (Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia)

STAFF EDITOR
Vera V. Zhdanova

0

2

January 2000, 36:36
Article Received: 05 November 1998

Interaction of albumins and hemin with aromatic antioxidants: A spectrophotometric and fluorometric study
Authors: O.B.Rus’, A.V.Puchkaev, A.I.Ivanov, D.I.Metelitsa
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus

Abstract
Difference spectrophotometry and fluorescence quenching of human and bovine serum albumins were used to determine their association constants(K a) with hemin in buffered physiological saline (pH 7.4) supplemented with 2% dimethylsulfoxide or in 40% aqueous dimethylformamide (pH 7.4).K a values depended on the medium, the extent of albumin delipidation, and on the method of determination. The formation of hemin complexes witho-phenylenediamine, tetramethylbenzidine, gallic acid, its polydisulfide, and two substituted di-tert-butyl pyrocatechols was studied by difference spectrophotometry in the same media;K a values for the complexes were calculated and compared to each other. The formation of complexes of these aromatic ligands with albumins was studied fluorometrically;K a values were of order of ∼105 M−1 and decreased with the ligand hydrophobicity.

Keywords
Apply Biochemistry Hemin Difference Spectrum Heme Iron Axial Ligand

Abbreviations
BSA - bovine serum albumin
HSA - human serum albumin
BSA’ - delipidated BSA
HSA’ - delipidated HSA
GA - gallic acid
GAPD - galic acid polydisulfide
TMB - 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine
OPD - ortho-phenylenediamine
InH1 - sodium (2,3-dihydroxy-4,6-di-tert-butylphenyl)-S-thiosulfate
InH2 - 3-(S-glutathionyl)-4,6-di-tert-butyl-pyrocatechol
DMSO - dimethylsulfoxide
DMF - dimethylformamide
BPS - buffered physiological saline (pH7.4)
C - concentration of a free ligand
Ka - association constant of a protein-ligand complex
Ka - average ligand-to-protein molar ratio
P - concentration of total protein

References

1. Landau, M.A.,Molekulyarnye mekhanizmy deistviyafiziologicheski aktivnykh soedinenii (Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Physologically Active Compounds), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.
Google Scholar
2. Beaven, G.H. and Chen, S.-H., D’Albis A., Gratzer W.B,Eur. J. Biochem., 1974, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 539–546.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Adams, P.A. and Berman, M.C.,Biochem. J., 1980, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 95–102.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
4. Rus’, O.B., Puchkaev, A.V., and Metelitsa, D.I.,Biokhimiya (Moscow), 1996, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 1813–1824.
Google Scholar
5. Shumyantseva, V.V., Bulko, T.V., Zimin, A.G., Uvaron, V.Yu., and Archakov, A.I.,Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int., 1996, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 503–510.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
6. Metelitsa, D.I., Rus’, O.B., Puchkaev, A.V., and Shadyro, O.I.,Biokhimiya (Moscow), 1997, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 323–333.
Google Scholar
7. Metelitsa, D.I., Rus’, O.B., and Puchkaev, A.V.,Zh. Prikl. Khim. (Leningrad), 1997, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 1713–1720.
Google Scholar
8. Rus’, O.B., Puchkaev, A.V., Losev, Yu.P., and Metelitsa, D.I.,Zh. Prikl. Khim. (Leningrad), 1998, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 842–848.
Google Scholar
9. Losev, Yu.P, Losev, V.U., Fedulov, A.S., Oleshkevich, F.V., Klimkovich, B.A., and Biryukova, N.M., USSR Inventor’s Certificate no. 1452087,Byull. Izobret., 1989, no. 4, p. 3.
Google Scholar
10. Fedulov, A.S., Focal Traumatic Damages of Brain: Clinico-experimental Basis of Antioxidant and Complex Therapy,Doctoral (Med.) Dissertation, Minsk, 1996.
Google Scholar
11. Petrikevich, D.K., Timoshchuk, V.A., Shadyro, O.I., Andreeva, O.T., Votyakov, V.I., and Zhelobkovich, V.E.,Khim-Farm. Zh., 1995, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 32–34.
Google Scholar
12. Metelitsa, D.I.,Modelirovanie Okislitel’no-Vosstanovitel’nykh Fermentov (Modelling of Redox Enzymes), Minsk: Nauka i Tekhnika, 1984.
Google Scholar
13. Cytochrome P-450, Ruckpaul, K. and Rein, H., Eds., Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1984, pp. 163–249.
Google Scholar
14. Eremin, A.N., Shibaev, V.A., and Metelitsa, D.I.,Izv. Akad. Nauk Bel. SSR, Ser. Khim. Nauk., 1988, no. 6, pp. 58–63.
Google Scholar
15. Metelitza, D.I. and Eryomin, A.N.,Fundamental Research in Homogeneous Catalysis, Shilov, A.E., Ed., London: Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ. Ltd, 1986, pp. 723–732.
Google Scholar
16. Metelitsa, D.I., Shibaev, V.A., Eremin, A.N., Mel’nik, V.I., and Zhilina, Z.I.,Biokhimiya (Moscow), 1995, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 349–363.
Google Scholar
17. Kongshaug, M.,Int. J. Biochem., 1992, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1239–1265.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Vorob’eva, E.V., Physico-chemical and Catalitic Characteristics of Gemine in Aqueous-Micellar Solutions,Cand. Sci. (Chem.) Dissertation, Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 1985.
Google Scholar
19. Collier, G.S., Praut, J.M., De Wet, C.R., Tschalala, C.,Biochem. J., 1979, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 281–289.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
20. Metelitsa, D.I., Savenkova, M.I., and Kurchenko, V.P.,Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol, 1987, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 116–124.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
21. Wanzlick, H.-W.,Angew. Chem., 1964, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 313–320.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Halfman, C.J. and Nishida, T.,Biochemistry, 1972, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 3493–3498.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Vasileva, R., Jakob, M., and Hasko, F.,J. Chromatogr., 1981, vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 279–284.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Laemmli, U.K.,Nature (London), 1970, vol. 227, no. {sm⪊259}, pp. 681–686.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Maurer, R.,Disk-Elektrophorese. Theorie und Praxis der Diskontinuierlichen Polyacrylamidgel-Elektrophorese, Heidelberg:Springer, 1968. Translated under the titleDisk-elektroforez, Moscow: Mir, 1972.
Google Scholar
26. Ivanov, A.I., Comparative Physico-chemical Characteristics of Albumin of Donors Blood and Patients with Hepatic and Renal Insufficiency,Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Minsk, 1996.
Google Scholar
27. Chen, R.F.,J. Biol. Chem., 1967, vol. 242, no. 1, pp. 173–181.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
28. Marshell, A.,Biophysical Chemistry, New York: Wiley, 1978. Translated under the titleBiofizicheskaya khimiya, Moscow: Mir, 1981, vol. 1, pp. 83–84.
Google Scholar
29. Scatchard, G.,Ann. N. Y.Acad. Sci., 1949, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 660–672.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Inorganic Biochemistry, Eichhorn, G., Ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1975. Translated under the titleNeorganicheskaya biokhimiya, Moscow: Mir, 1978, vol. 2, pp. 218–255.
Google Scholar
31. Porfiriny: spektroskopiya, elektrokhimiya, primenenie (Porphyrins: Spectroscopy, Electrochemistry, Application), Enikollopyana, N.S., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1987.
Google Scholar
32. Kratkaya khimicheskaya entsiklopediya (Brief Chemical Encyclopaedia), Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopedia, 1961, vol. 1, p. 778.
Google Scholar
33. Likhtenshtein, G.I.,Uspekhi Biol. Khimii, 1982, vol. 23, pp. 3–23.
Google Scholar
34. Klotz, I.M.,Science, 1982, vol. 217, no. 24, pp. 1247–1249.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2000

About this article

Cite this article as:
Rus’, O.B., Puchkaev, A.V., Ivanov, A.I. et al. Appl Biochem Microbiol (2000) 36: 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02738133
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02738133
Publisher Name Nauka/Interperiodica
Print ISSN 0003-6838
Online ISSN 1608-3024

0

3

January 2000, 36:15

Adaptation of Rhodococcus rhodochrous M8, a producer of acrylamide, to changes in ammonium concentration in the growth medium
Authors: O.B.Astaurova, T.E.Leonova, I.N.Polyakova, I.V.Sineokaya, V.K.Gordeev, A.S.Yanenko
Institute of Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The mechanism of adaptation of the acrylamide producing strainRhodococcus rhodochrous M8 to changes in ammonium concentrations in the medium was studied. An increase in the content of ammonium in the medium changed the activity of glutamine synthetase (GS) (EC 6.3.1.2) and glutamine dehydrogenase (GD) (EC 1.4.1.4), the enzymes of ammonium assimilation, as well as the activities of enzymes responsible for nitrile utilization: nitrile hydratase (EC 4.2.1.84) and amidase (EC 3.5.1.4). This also inhibited the activation of GS induced by phosphodiesterase (EC 3.1.4.1 ). Increases in the activities of nitrile hydratase and amidase and resistance of these enzymes to ammonium were observed in mutant ofR. rhodichrous resistant to phosphotricine, an inhibitor of GS. An important role of GS in the mechanism of adaptation is suggested.

Keywords
Nitrile Apply Biochemistry Glutamine Synthetase Asparaginase Glutamine Synthetase Activity

References

1. DiGeronimo, MJ. and Antoine, A.D.,Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1976, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 900–906.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
2. Miller, J.M. and Gray, D.O.,J. Gen. Microbiol, 1982, vol. 128, no. 8, pp. 1803–1809.
Google Scholar
3. Yamada, H. and Kobayashi, M.,Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 1996, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1391–1400.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Rimmington, A.,Microbiol. Europe, 1994, no. 2.
Google Scholar
5. Yanenko, A.S., Astaurova, O.B., Gerasimova, T.V., and Polyakova, I.N., Pogorelova T.E., Paukov V.N.,Biotechnologia, 1995, no. 7–8, pp. 139–144.
Google Scholar
6. Astaurova, O.B., Pogorelova, T.E., Fomina, O.R., Polyakova, I.N., and Yanenko, A.S.,Biotechnologiya, 1991, no. 5, pp. 10–14.
Google Scholar
7. Astaurova, O.B., Larikova, G.A., Polyakova, I.N., and Yanenko, A.S.,Biotechnologiya, 1993, no. 11–12, pp. 6–8.
Google Scholar
8. Magasanik, B.,Escherichia Coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, Neidhardt, F.C., Ed., Washington: Am. Soc. Microbiol., 1996, vol. 1, pp. 1344–1356.
Google Scholar
9. Reitzer, L.J.,Escherichia Coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, Neidhardt, F.C., Ed., Washington: Am. Soc. Microbiol., 1996, vol. 1, pp. 380–407.
Google Scholar
10. Bender, R.A., Janssen, K.A., Resnik, A.D., Blumenberg, M., Foor, F., and Magasanik, K.B.,J. Bacteriol, 1977, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 1001–1009.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
11. Pogorelova, T.E., Ryabchenko, L.E., Sunzov, N.I., and Yanenko, A.S.,FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 1996, vol. 144, no. 2-3, pp. 191–195.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hjort, CM., Godtfredsen, S.E., and Emborg, C.,J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 1990, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 217–226.
Google Scholar
13. Brammar, W.J. and Clarke, P.H.,J. Gen. Microbiol., 1964, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 307–319.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
14. Streicher, S.L. and Tyler, B.,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1981, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 229–233.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Behrmann, I., Hillemann, D., and Puhler, A.,J. Bacteriol., 1990, vol. 172, no. 9, pp. 5326–5334.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
16. Brana, A.F., Paiva, N., and Demain, A.L.,J. Gen. Microbiol., 1986, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 1305–1317.
Google Scholar
17. Astaurova, O.B., Myslovataya, M.L., Timokhina, E.A., Belareva, A.V., and Kapitonova, O.N.,Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol, 1991, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 731–737.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
18. Leonova T.E., Astaurova O.B., Ryabchenko L.E., Yanenko A.SAppl. Biochem. Biotechnol., (in press).
Google Scholar
19. Fisher, S.H. and Wray, L.V.,J. Bacteriol, 1989, vol. 171, no. 5, pp. 2378–2383.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
20. Ramaley, R.F., Fernald, N., and Deuries, T.,Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1972, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 88–94.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Atkinson, M.R. and Fisher, S.H.,J. Bacteriol., 1991, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 23–27.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
22. Fisher, S.Y.,J. Bacteriol, 1989, vol. 171, no. 5, pp. 2372–2377.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
23. Bascaran, V., Hardisson, C.H., and Brana, A.F.,J. Gen. Microbiol., 1989, vol. 135, no. 9, pp. 2475–2482.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
24. Astaurova, O.B., Sineokaya, I.V., Myslovataya, M.L., and Kirillova, N.M.,Biotechnologiya, 1991, no. 1, pp. 7–10.
Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2000

About this article

Cite this article as:
Astaurova, O.B., Leonova, T.E., Polyakova, I.N. et al. Appl Biochem Microbiol (2000) 36:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02738128
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02738128
Publisher Name Nauka/Interperiodica
Print ISSN 0003-6838
Online ISSN 1608-3024

0

4

January 2000, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 1–3
Received February 5, 1999

A polyclonal antiserum to the noncatalytic part of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei
Authors: M.L.Gerner. G.V.Leontyeva, I.G.Romenskaya, M.S.Melnick, M.L.Rabinovich
Institute of Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Leninskii pr. 33, Moscow, 117071 Russia;
fax: (7 095)954-2732; e-mail: inbio@glas.apc.org

Abstract
A specific antiserum to the noncatalytic part of cellobiohydrolase I fromTrichoderma reesei was obtained by exhaustion of rabbit antiserum to the native enzyme with its catalytic domain prepared by papain treatment of cellobiohydrolase I tightly adsorbed onto microcrystalline cellulose.

Preview
Cellobiohydrolase (CBH) I is the major component of cellulase systems of soil and wood-rot fungi, which defines their ability to degradation of highly ordered native cellulose [1, 2]. The enzyme molecule consists of a catalytic domain (CD) and a cellulose-binding domain (CBD) spatially separated by a glycosylated linker [3, 4].
CD has a size of 4 x 5 x 6 nm and contains 434 amino acid residues folded in a Con A-type [3-sandwich. Such a structure has also been identified in bacterial 1,3;I,4-[3-glucanases [5, 6] and family 7 glycosylhydrolases (formerly the cellulase family A) [5-8].
The C-terminal CBD of CBH I consists of 38 amino acid residues folded in a wedge-shaped structure with distinct hydrophobic and hydrophobic faces which are formed by distorted 13-sheet of three short antiparallel [3-strands and a loop fixed by two SS-bonds, respectively [9]. Along with other known fungal CBDs, the CBD of CBH I belongs to the first of twelve described CBD's families [10, 11]. The role of CBD in the mechanism of action of polysaccharide hydrolases is not yet clear, although its removal or mutation of its important residues leads to a significant loss of the CBH I adsorption
and degradation of native cellulose, but has little effect on the hydrolysis of soluble cellooligosaccharides and their derivatives [3, 12].
The CD and the CBD of the CBH I are separated by a linker GN x PSGGNPPGTIT'I'RRPATTFGSSP (where x is the papain site that separates the active CD from CBD). The linker contains a flexible repeat GNP(S/P)G (a tentative hinge) and a rigid glycosylated fragment TaR2PAT 3 providing spatial separation of the domains [13, 14]. The length of the linker region was found to be crucial for the ability of mutant CBH I molecules to cleave insoluble cellulose [14]. Removal of the hinge along with the rigid part reduced the activity of mutant CBH I to the insoluble cellulose, but had little
effect on the adsorption.
Immunological methods were widely used for the isolation and identification of cellulolytic enzymes [15-18]. Antibodies, particularly monoclonal ones, were found to be extremely useful tools for identification of multiple forms of cellulases during post-secretion proteolysis [19, 20]. Monoclonal antibodies to either certain enzymes of the cellulase system or certain structural elements (CD, CBD or linker sequence) of these enzymes were most commonly used to identify the products of posttranslational modification of cellulases [21]. The strict specificity of monoclonal antibodies to certain epitopes on the surface of the antigen provides a unique advantage for their application as an analytical tool. However, preparation of monoclonal antibodies, particularly domain-specific ones, still
remains expensive and meets significant experimental difficulties. This paper deals with a simplified method of preparation of antibodies to the noncatalytic part of CBH I from Trichoderma reesei, starting from the antiserum to the native enzyme.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
CBH I from Trichoderma reesei, as well as its CD prepared by means of restricted papain proteolysis of the intact enzyme adsorbed onto a cellulose surface were obtained as described in [22].
Polyclonal antiserum to CBH I from Trichoderma reesei was obtained by multiple immunization of two young female rabbits. Protein loading at each immunization procedure was approximately 1 mg per kg animal body weight. The injections were performed on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 31 of immunization. The antigen protein was dissolved in 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.15 M NaCI in complete Freund's adjuvant for the first injection and in the same buffer without adjuvant for subsequent injections.
Blood was sampled on day 37 after the first injection.
Exhaustion experiments were performed with the original antiserum diluted with 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.15 M NaCI and 0. 1% Tween 20, whereas dilutions of the corresponding exhausted antiserum were prepared with the same buffer containing CD (6.6 l.tg/ml). Both the original and exhausted antisera were then incubated for 1 h at 37~ and used in the conventional procedure of solid-phase enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) by using peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit antibodies (diagnostic donkey immunoglobulins to rabbit immunoglobulins G (H + L)
labeled with horseradish peroxidase manufactured by the Bacterial Preparations Producing Enterprise at the N.F. Gamaleya Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow) and 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethyl-2,3-dihydrobenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) as a substrate for peroxidase. EIA was performed according to the standard procedure [23] in polystyrene plates (Dynatech, USA) by using a Dynatech MP 600 spectrophotometric EIA reader (USA).

Table 1. EIA of antisera to intact CBH I (the antigen concentration in the plate wells 20 ug/ml)

Antiserum

Dilution
6000

Dilution
12000

Dilution
24000

Dilution
48000

Dilution
96000

Nonimmunized-rabbit
(control)

0.12

0.1

0.07

0.05

0.04

Immunized ones: I

1.15

1.0

0.75

0.55

0.34

Immunized ones: II

1.03

0.81

0.52

0.35

0.21

Table 2. EIA of selected antiserum to the intact CBH I and its CD (the antigen (Ag) concentration in the plate wells 6.6 ug/ml)
Antiserum
Nonimmunized-rabbit (control)
Original
Exhausted by CD
Dilution
Ag-intact CBH I Ag-CD
400 1600 6400 1600 6400 25 600
0.01 0.00
0.35 0.19
0.23 0.17
0.01
0.47
0.40
25 600 400
0.00 0.01
0.07 0.31
0.07 0.18
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.15 0.05 0.00
0.05 0.01 0.00

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Two antiserum samples specific to the intact CBH and its CD were obtained as a result of immunization procedure (Tables 1, 2).
Based on data of Table 1, antiserum of the first rabbit with the titer over 200 000 to intact CBH I was chosen for further experiments.
Table 2 shows that the titer to CD of the obtained antiserum was at least four times lower than for the intact CBH I, whereas CD with a molecular weight of 56 kDa according to SDS-PAGE data comprised more than 85% of the total weight of intact CBH I (65 kDa). Most likely, the noncatalytic part of the enzyme molecule possesses stronger antigenic properties despite its small size and low molecular weight. One of possible reasons for this phenomenon could be its high glycosylation level (up to 50%).
Table 2 also shows the results of EIA with an antiserum exhausted by CD. Such an antiserum at a dilution of 1600 was found (see data of Table 2) to be specific to the noncatalytic part (linker and the CBD) of the intact CBH I, because of the lack of response to the enzyme'CD. This enables the use of exhausted antiserum for selection of CBD-producing recombinant microorganisms by means of immunoblotting or sandwich immunoassay, as well as for direct study of the role of the CBDantibody complex formation in the mechanism of action of the intact CBH I on the surface of microcrystalline cellulose.

Keywords
Cellulase Apply Biochemistry Catalytic Domain Papain Microcrystalline Cellulose

References

1. Kubicek, C.P.,Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol., Fiechter, A., Ed., Berlin: Springer, 1992, vol. 45, pp. 1–27.
Google Scholar
2. Tomme, P., Warren, R.A.J., and Gilkes, N.R.,Adv. Microbial Physiol., 1995, vol. 37, pp. 1–81.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Van Tilbeurgh, H., Tomme, P., Claeyssens, M., Bhikhabhai, R., and Pettersson, G.,FEBS Lett., 1986, vol. 204, pp. 223–227.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Tomme, P., Van Tilbeurgh, H., Pettersson, G., Van Damme, J., Vandekerckhove, J., Knowles, J., Teeri, T., and Claeyssens, M.,Eur. J. Biochem., 1988, vol. 170, pp. 575–581.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Divne, C., Sinning, I., Stahlberg, J., Pettersson, G., Bailey, M., Sukaaho, M., Margolles-Clark, E., Teeri, T.T., and Jones, T.A.,J. Mol. Biol., 1993, vol. 234, pp. 905–910.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Divne, C., Stahlberg, J., Reinikainen, T., Ruohonen, L., Pettersson, G., Knowles, J.K.C., Teeri, T.T., and Jones, T.A.,Science, 1994, vol. 265, pp 524–530.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Davies, G., Tolley, S., Wilson, K., Schulein, M., and Dodson, G.,J. Mol. Biol., 1992, vol. 228, pp. 970–972.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Henrissat, B. and Bairoch, A.,Biochem. J., 1996, vol. 316, pp. 722–726.
Google Scholar
9. Kraulis, P.J., Clore, G.M., Nigles, M., Jones, T.A., Pettersson, G., Knowles, J.K.C., and Gronenborn, A.M.,Biochemistry, 1989, vol. 28, pp. 7241–7257.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Tomme, P., Warren, A.J., Miller, R.C., Jr., Kilburn, D.G., and Gilkes, N.R.,Enzymatic Degradation of Insoluble Carbohydrates, Saddler, J. and Penner, M., Eds., 1995, ACS, Washington D.C. (USA), pp. 1–12.
Google Scholar
11. Hoffen, A.-M., Teeri, T.T., and Teleman, O.,Prot. Eng., 1995, vol. 8, pp. 443–450.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Reinikainen, T.,Proteins, 1995, vol. 22, pp. 392–403.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Gilkes, N.R., Henrissat, B., Kilburn, D.G., Miller, R.C., Jr., and Warren, R.A.,J. Microbiol. Rev., 1991, vol. 55, pp. 303–315.
Google Scholar
14. Srisodsuk, M, Reinikainen, T., and Teeri, T.T.,J. Biol. Chem., 1993, vol. 268, pp. 20756–20761.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
15. Nummi, M., Niku-Paavola, M.-L., Lappalainen, A., Enari, T.-M., and Raunio, V.,Biochem. J., 1983, vol. 215, pp. 677–684.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
16. Chanzy, H., Henrissat, B., Vuong, R., and Schulein, M.,FEBS Lett., 1983, vol. 153, pp. 113–118.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Witte, K., Heitz, H.-J., Wartenberg, A.,Acta Biotechnol., 1990, vol. 10, pp. 41–48.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Tomme, P., Heriban, V., and Claeyssens, M.,Biotechnol. Lett., 1990, vol. 12, pp. 525–530.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Hagspiel, K., Szakmary, K., and Kubicek, C.P.,J. BiotechnoL, 1990, vol. 16, pp. 187–198.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Hagspiel, K., Haab, D., and Kubicek, C.P.,Appl. Microbiol. BiotechnoL, 1989, vol. 32, pp. 61–67.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Kolbe, J. and Kubicek, C.P.,Appl. Microbiol. BiotechnoL, 1990, vol. 34, pp 26–30.
PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Gerner, M.L., Mel’nik, M.S., and Rabinovich, M.L.,Biochemistry, Moscow, 1999, vol. 64, pp. 1204–1213.
Google Scholar
23. Blake, C., Jould, B.Y.,Analyst, 1984, vol. 109, pp. 533–547.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2000

About this article

Cite this article as:
Gerner, M.L., Leontyeva, G.V., Romenskaya, I.G. et al. Appl Biochem Microbiol (2000) 36: 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02738124
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02738124
Publisher Name Nauka/Interperiodica
Print ISSN 0003-6838
Online ISSN 1608-3024

0

5

January 2000, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 4–7
Article Received: 17 August 1998

Preparative dephosphorylation of calcium salts of 2′(3″)-mononucleotides with extracellular phosphatase from Spicaria violacea
Authors: V. N. BaraiI. A. SeverinaT. A. KukharskayaA. I. Zinchenko
Institute of MicrobiologyNational Academy of SciencesBelarus

Abstract
The properties of the phosphatase present in the culture liquid ofSpicaria violacea were investigated. Based on these results, a method for preparative dephosphorylation of calcium salts of 2′(3′)-mononucleotides was proposed. A 96–98% yield was achieved at a substrate concentration of 100 mg/ml. Mild quantitative hydrolysis of RNA to nucleosides can be performed by RNA digestion to mononucleotides with Ca2+ followed by the proposed dephosphorylation procedure.

Keywords
Apply Biochemistry Nucleoside Culture Liquid Calcium Salt Chemical Hydrolysis

Preparative Dephosphorylation of Calcium Salts
of 2'(3")-Mononucleotides with Extracellular Phosphatase
from Spicaria violacea
V. N. Barai, I. A. Severina, T. A. Kukharskaya, and A. I. Zinchenko
Institute of Microbiology, National Academy of Sciences, Belarus
Received August 17, 1998
Abstract--The properties of the phosphatase present in the culture liquid of Spicaria violacea were investigated. Based on these results, a method for preparative dephosphorylation of calcium salts of 2'(3')-mononucleotides was proposed. A 96-98% yield was achieved at a substrate concentration of 100 mg/ml. Mild quantitative
hydrolysis of RNA to nucleosides can be performed by RNA digestion to mononucleotides with Ca 2§ followed
by the proposed dephosphorylation procedure.
Recently we proposed a two-step method for preparation
of natural ribonucleosides by chemical hydrolysis
of RNA with Ca 2§ ions followed by dephosphorylation
of the resulting calcium salts of mononucleotides
with phosphatase bound to the mycelium of the microscopical
fungus Spicaria violacea [1, 2]. By doing so,
we attempted to combine the advantages of chemical
hydrolysis of RNA (fast hydrolysis of RNA to mononucleotides)
and the enzymatic approach, which is characterized
by highly efficient dephosphorylation of
mononucleotides. The latter is related to the fact that
the resulting orthophosphate is precipitated by calcium
ions and does not inhibit the phosphatase any more.
In spite of these advantages, it was necessary to
increase the starting RNA concentration in the reaction
mixture from 20 to at least 100 mg/ml in order to make
the method competitive with conventional chemical
protocols [3, 4]. We had demonstrated that the phosphatase
bound to the mycelium of Spicaria violacea
can dephosphorylate calcium salts of 2'(3')-mononucleotides
with high yields at concentrations up to
100 mg/ml [5]. However, such a high concentration
requires the presence of great amounts of mycelium in
the reaction mixture. This hampers stirring the mixture
and isolating nucleosides.
We found that the culture liquid obtained during cultivation
of Spicaria violacea BM-105D in a phosphatedeficient
medium at acidic pH contained several times
more phosphatase than was bound to the mycelium.
This opened up new possibilities for the practical use of
the enzyme.
The goal of the study was to investigate the properties
of phosphatase in the culture liquid (CL) of Spicaria
violacea BM-105D and to apply it to ribonucleoside
preparation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RNA was isolated from baker yeast as in [6].
The mixture of calcium salts of 2'(3')-nucleoside
monophosphates was obtained by RNA hydrolysis
according to our method described in [ 1 ].
The fungus S. violacea was cultivated as in [7]. The
starting culture medium was acidified with 0.2% lactic
acid.
Phosphatase activity was assayed by the rate of
p-nitrophenyl phosphate dephosphorylation. The reaction
mixture (1 ml) containing 0.01 M p-nitrophenyl
phosphate, 0.1 M Na-acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and 20 I.tl of
the assayed solution was incubated at 60~ for 15 min.
The reaction was terminated with 2 ml of 0.4 M NaOH.
The amount of the resulting p-nitrophenol was measured
spectrophotometrically at 400 nm. The amount of
the enzyme converting 1 nmol of the substrate per
minute was taken to be unity.
The effect of pH on the phosphatase activity was
investigated in two buffers: 50 mM Na acetate buffer
(pH from 4.0 to 6.5) and Tris-HC1 buffer (pH from 7.0
to 9.0).
Stability of the enzyme at various pH values was
investigated by incubating samples of the CL filtrate
containing the above buffers at the concentration of
50 mM at 50~ for 30 min.
For investigation of thermal stability of the phosphatase,
samples of the CL filtrate containing 50 mM
Na-acetate buffer (pH 5.0) were incubated at required
temperatures for 30 min.
All numerical values reported in the study are mean
values of three or four measurements.
0003-6838/00/360t-0004525.00 9 2000 MAIK "Nauka/lnterperiodica"
PREPARATIVE DEPHOSPHORYLATION OF CALCIUM SALTS 5
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The experiments with the CL filtrate (phosphatase
not isolated) described below could be accomplished
owing to the fact that the filtrate had a high enzymatic
activity (4-5 U/ml) and retained this activity without
any notable loss at 40~ for several weeks. Note that
the phosphatase activity of the CL might be contributed
by several proteins.
First, we studied the effects of pH and temperature
on the phosphatase activity and stability in the CL filtrate
of S. violacea BM-105D. The results are presented
in Figure l a. They demonstrate that nearly all phosphatase
activity was observed under acidic conditions,
the pH optimum being at 5.25-5.75, and the enzyme
was stable at pH values from 4.5 to 6.5.
It is seen from Figure I b that the optimum temperature
for the phosphatase activity is 60~ Nevertheless,
15 m heating of the enzyme at temperatures above
50~ inactivated it to a marked extent. After heating at
60~ the CL filtrate retained only one-third of the
starting phosphatase activity, and heating at 65~ inactivated
the enzyme by 96%. These data may be indicative
of an effect of enzyme protection from heat inactivation
by the substrate (or reaction product). This was
especially notable at 65~ We performed experiments
to find out what stabilizes the enzyme.
The results of the experiments, shown in Table 1,
indicate that orthophosphate, a common product of
reactions catalyzed by the enzyme, exerted the greatest,
concentration-dependent, stabilizing action. It is worth
noting that the other product demonstrated no stabilizing
action on the enzyme. It was astonishing that the
substrate could only slightly protect the enzyme from
heat inactivation. Incubation of the CL filtrate with the
substrate at 65~ brought about its 50% dephosphoryTable
1. Effect of the substrate and the reaction products on
the thermal stability of phosphatase in S. violacea CL filtrate
Substrate
No
2'(3')-AMP
Adenosine
Orthophosphate
Orthophosphate
Orthophosphate
Orthophosphate
2'(Y)-AMP + orthophosphate

Heating (65~ 10 min)
Concentration
of the reaction
product, mM
0
10
10
10
5
3
1
against 5
Remanent phosphatase
activity after heating, %*
5
9
5
32
30
26
18
10
* Phosphatase activity was measured at 60~ pH 5.5.
iation, and the resulting orthophosphate was expected
to be able to protect the enzyme. This contradiction was
resolved in an experiment on the effect of a mixture
orthophosphate-substrate on the enzyme stability. It
was found that the substrate completely eliminated the
stabilizing effect of orthophosphate. In other words,
neither the substrate nor its mixture with orthophosphate
can protect the enzyme from heat inactivation.
This may result in a mismatch between the optimum
temperatures for its activity and achievement of high
yields in prolonged reactions. This is confirmed by the
results shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that during the
first 5-10 min of the reaction, the enzyme was apparA,%

100
80
60
40
20
2
I I I I T '''~
4 5 6 7 8
pH
%
100 ~-~
80 I
6O
40
20
030 4 50 60 70
t, ~
Fig. 1. Effect of pH (a) and temperature (b) on phosphatase activity and stability in S. violacea CL filtrate: (1) activity, % of the
maximum; (2) remanent activity, % of the initial value.

0


Вы здесь » Kyouwago » Биохимия и микробиология » Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology